Necropolis: London and Its Dead

Necropolis London and Its Dead Layer upon layer of London soil reveals burials from pre historic and medieval times The city is one giant grave filled with the remains of previous eras The Houses of Parliament sit on the edge of a

  • Title: Necropolis: London and Its Dead
  • Author: Catharine Arnold
  • ISBN: 9781416502487
  • Page: 342
  • Format: Paperback
  • Layer upon layer of London soil reveals burials from pre historic and medieval times The city is one giant grave, filled with the remains of previous eras The Houses of Parliament sit on the edge of a former plague pit St Paul s is built over human remains Underground tunnels were driven through forgotten catacombs, thick with bones A society can be judged by the wayLayer upon layer of London soil reveals burials from pre historic and medieval times The city is one giant grave, filled with the remains of previous eras The Houses of Parliament sit on the edge of a former plague pit St Paul s is built over human remains Underground tunnels were driven through forgotten catacombs, thick with bones A society can be judged by the way it treats its dead, and this is especially true of London From Roman burial rites to the horrors of the plague, from the founding of the great Victorian cemeteries to the development of cremation and the cult of mourning that surrounded the death of Diana, Princess of Wales Necropolis leaves no headstone unturned in its exploration of our changing attitudes towards the deceased among us.Catharine Arnold read English at Cambridge and holds a further degree in Psychology A journalist and academic with a particular interest in death and crime, Catharine s previous books include the acclaimed novel Lost TimeDescription sourced from the book.

    • Best Download [Catharine Arnold] ↠ Necropolis: London and Its Dead || [Science Book] PDF ✓
      342 Catharine Arnold
    • thumbnail Title: Best Download [Catharine Arnold] ↠ Necropolis: London and Its Dead || [Science Book] PDF ✓
      Posted by:Catharine Arnold
      Published :2019-06-27T15:33:50+00:00

    221 Comment

    • Melki says:

      If you like reading history with a slightly macabre touch, you should find this book to be absolutely fascinating.Here is a brief overview of burial customs through the centuries, from the mass graves hurriedly dug for plague victims to the rising social acceptance of cremation. Several chapters are devoted to the Victorians who elevated mourning and bereavement to an art form. Much like the lavish wedding industry that exists today, funerals were BIG business. Stores like Jay's London General M [...]

    • Nikki says:

      Necropolis is surprisingly compelling and readable. Most of it isn't at all dry or dull -- at times the names and dates blur into each other, but most of it is fascinating. It covers traditions of burial and mourning from the pre-Roman period to more or less the present, especially as concerns London. It's kind of amazing how we take relatively recent burial traditions for granted -- for my family, the plot of land bought years ago, the simple headstones, a flowerbed over the grave, and an expec [...]

    • Mark says:

      I do not think I actually want to know how many of my reviews on here touch on the subject of the soul of place, of genius loci. It's a fair few, and I doubt that number will be a static one. And so it goes. I have to wonder whether studying the spirit of a city like London, a city which has a distinct personality, one that has aged and matured like a person might, whether such a course might aid me in detecting the spirit of smaller places, towns and cities less venerable. Maybe, maybe not. Thi [...]

    • Lisa says:

      A fascinating look at how London has dealt with its dead through the ages, taking us from the Pagans and Romans, through the Middle Ages and the Victorians, up until modern times, and taking in numerous plagues and epidemics, a few fires and two World Wars, the death of Lady Di and the London bombings, while moving from outside the city, into its heart and then back out again. Informative, astonishing, gruesome and revealing, this book nearly managed to outdo my record of how many times I could [...]

    • Florin Pitea says:

      Very well documented, nicely written, with relevant examples and black-and-white images. Recommended.

    • Bjorn says:

      Reading Peter Ackroyd's London: The Biography a few years ago, I was struck (as Ackroyd intended) by the idea of genius loci: the soul of a place. Every single person, every single building, every single atom of London has been replaced several times over - and yet the places remain, the names remain, the ghosts remain. Which is very much where Necropolis lives. Dealing with both the logistics and the emotions surrounding death in a large city that has to make room for both living and dead, it's [...]

    • Kat says:

      Why does the tube make those weird turns between Knightsbridge and South Kensington?Why do we wear the colour black for mourning?Why was King James I not allowed to enter London for days after the death of Queen Elisabeth I ?Questions like these are answered in this entertaining and informative book, and the answers all have to do with funerals. As a former gravedigger I have a professional interest in cemeteries, but I'm generally interested in funerals.Also, since London has been my chosen hom [...]

    • Abbey says:

      I love it when my reading overlaps. I was reading "Arthur and George" by Julian Barnes, and his character Arthur muses about death while traveling past Woking. I knew what he was thinking about because I was also reading "Necropolis." The best part of the book for me is the story of the huge cemetery in Woking - the planning, the train station built especially for funerals from London (60 a day), and its fall into disuse. Overall, I gave it a 3 because it didn't keep my attention like it should [...]

    • Jo says:

      Arnold looks at death and funerary rites and people's attitudes towards death, mainly centred around London. She covers everything from the pre-Roman era to the defiance of Londoners after the bombings of 2005. Truly fascinating and Arnold has such a wonderful writing style that veers towards the chatty rather than the academic.

    • Andrea says:

      In thinking about cities and how they work I never considered death in its proper light, and what burial requires in a crowded metropolis. Having just finished Necropolis: London and its Dead, that has certainly changed. Neighbourhoods founded on putrescence, typhoid, bones emerging from the ground along with noxious gases and flying beetles, all of these things were unknown to me and dwelt upon at greater length here.I enjoyed this book, though it is more an historical presentation of quirks an [...]

    • ^ says:

      Very enjoyable, and a stark reminder of how quickly and massively London has grown. As the present-day population continues to increase, one cannot help but wonder what future technologies will develop for the disposal of our dead. I should have liked to have learned more about Roman and Saxon cremation / burial practices in London; however, I guess I shall simply have to take myself off the Museum of London. This book doesn’t really get into its stride until it reaches description and discuss [...]

    • Loren says:

      London is basically built on layer upon layer of graves. The book opens with the Bronze Age tumulus on Parliament Hill, which she calls one of the oldest burial grounds in the city, predating Highgate Cemetery by over 4000 years. I would have liked to hear much more about the earliest burials in the area.And I would have liked to read more about the Roman-era graves as well. I was thoroughly fascinated by the earliest chapters of this book, since those are the times I am the least familiar with. [...]

    • Lizixer says:

      Beginning far back in the mists of time at the bronze age tumulus on Parliament Hill and ending in an informal memorial garden in Kings Cross for the victims of a terrorist bombing, Catherine Arnald explores both changing attitudes to death and the ways that disposal of the dead changed. Our mediaeval ancestors lived cheek by jowl with death burying their dead close by, but cataclysmic events such as the Black Death and the 1665 plague spelled changes that eventually saw the end of inner city bu [...]

    • Tom says:

      When a book is introduced with the line "London is one giant grave" you know you're in for a good time. It skips quite merrily through the history of Roman and Saxon burial before getting into the meat of things: the plague, and the history of the grand Victorian cemeteries. There's the odd (very welcome) poetic interlude, and it really gets across quite how grotty London has been for most of its history - until recently the price of city living was a remarkably high death toll. Along the way to [...]

    • Siobhan says:

      We all have those family members who like to lumber you with things once they find out about your interest.Well this book came from my aunt when she found out about my interest in forensic psychology. Supposedly I need to become an expert in the criminal world – mainly I need to be able to recite the heinous acts of countless individuals across history.Okay, maybe she did not put it like that but it sort of felt that way when she handed me numerous books on the topic.Still, despite the fact th [...]

    • Anjella says:

      Started off well but got very dry and boring after a while. The cover says "Catharine Arnold romps across the cemeteries" but it's much more of a trudge with an occasional trip over a grave to give a story about someone buried, but the actually interesting stories seem to be just hinted at and left behind. The early sections were good, though so little of burials pre-Roman times unfortunately, but once it hits the Victorian era she gets bogged down in details of who bought what cemetery and for [...]

    • Chris says:

      Interesting subject, starts off absorbing but gets more dry as it goes. About 1/3 of the way in it largely degenerates into a historical timeline with a few meager bits of human interest. Although the author can appreciate the humor of others, she doesn't display humor in her own writing.

    • Emily Woolford says:

      I'm not a huge lover of non-fiction, but a friend gave me this book to read because she knew of my macabre interests. And I must admit I found it extremely interesting and it was definitely up my street. I loved learning about how they buried folk during the plague and I was really keen to read about typical Victorian mourning fashions.I even felt a little emotional when reading about WW1 and 2 because of my personal connection with the RAF.Definitely a good read for those with a more 'danse mac [...]

    • Mel says:

      I will admit I got bored with this. It was a good popular history, with detailed references that drew on a lot of different sources. However, she seemed to tell stories more than anything there was very little historical analysis or arguments. It was description more than anything and there seemed to be a lack of logic for some of the chapters and digressions within the chapters. Still fairly entertaining, though I think I'd recommend hearing the author speak instead of reading the book.

    • Carole Tyrrell says:

      NecropolisThis is a second reading of this informative and often lively book on how London treats its dead.London is actually a giant burial ground and Arnold begins her tour of the city at its oldest burial site; Parliament Hill Fields’ Bronze Age tumulus. Then she reveals how layer upon layer of London soil is filled with the dead. In fact, the Houses of Parliament sits on the edge of a former plague pit, St Paul’s is built over human remains and underground tunnels are often tunnelled thr [...]

    • Roxanne says:

      The subject matter of this book was fascinating - how the people of London have handled the burial/disposal of the dead over many centuries - but the book left me a little flat. The chapters are in roughly chronological order, but within each chapter, I thought the material could have been organized a little better. There were some spots where Arnold repeats herself, which a good editor should have caught. There are a few photos included in the book, but I would have liked more, and some charts/ [...]

    • Julie Ballantyne Brown says:

      While this book was an intriguing read, some of the items stated as facts were not true. For example, in Chapter 3, p. 34, she says that Cardinal Wolsey was sent to the scaffold, but he wasn't. Cardinal Wolsey died of an illness on his way to see Henry VIII; it's a well-documented fact. He was probably going to be executed, but he died naturally before it could happen. On p. 35, she says that Anne Boleyn was only convicted of treason, not incest. Anne Boleyn WAS convicted of incest, as well as t [...]

    • RavenclawReadingRoom says:

      This was fine, but not as interesting as I was hoping. Essentially three quarters of the book focuses on Victorian London and the "cult of death". Which is understandable in some ways - it was during the Victorian period that cemeteries moved out of the city, it was during the Victorian period that mourning really became a thing, it was during the Victorian period that cremation started to pop up. But at the same time, there's SO MUCH MORE to London's history, and having one chapter on pre-histo [...]

    • Rachel- Goodbye Borders says:

      3.5It's interesting how the dead have been treated throughout history. It's amazing to me that London is (essentially) one big grave. It makes sense given the space and the amount of people that have lived there since time began. It was interesting to read about cremation and it falling out of favor with the rise of Christianity. Then it coming back into favor hundreds of years later whether for cost, space, or preference.This was a bit more academic then I thought it would be. Don't get me wron [...]

    • Kari says:

      I enjoyed this. It's an area of history that is generally neglected but I found it really interesting. Why talk about dead people when you can discuss kings and queens?! It was good to find out where certain customs and funeral traditions originated. Sometimes Arnold jumped around a bit from subject to subject which could be confusing. I'm sure she started making a point about the problems of burying prisoners that she never finished! Or maybe I just missed it. It felt like while writing she wou [...]

    • S says:

      Not exactly the book I was expecting it to be, as I figured from the title and back notes made it sound like it would be a big historical about London and its graveyards, almost like a tour guide of the grave sites.It's more about how London handled mass jumps in dead during the times of the plagues and how death and graveyards where viewed and effected life during the Victorian times.While it wasn't what I was expecting it was better then I thought it was going to be. A good read, more so if yo [...]

    • secondwomn says:

      good info, enthusiastic writing, lots of details. could have used more editorial work (disorganized). i now need to research the music hall tune "they're moving grandpa's grave to build a sewer." reread on may 24, 2010 because i somehow picked it up & couldn't remember if i'd read it before or not. then once i was like 3 pages in i realized i had. still entertaining.

    • Cate says:

      I loved it, but then I like cemetries and have an ambition to visit the great necropolis' WHEN I get back of London. Social history of how death & mourning have been dealt with through time in a large & growing city.

    • J.M. says:

      Very informative, not just of London and its dead but of the culture of death and how our attitudes have changed over the years in regards to death, its customs, and funerary practices. I enjoyed this a lot, but it was very dense in parts. I'd give it more of a 3.5 than a 4, but I rounded up.

    • Chris says:

      At times, this book feels like a list, but there are some intersting little tidbits sprinkled thoughout.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *